5946158e90ca675b20ce9d70d49e6a34

Orphan Black: Otherness and the Ethics of Science

Orphan Black is a series that deals with and explores the ethics and morality of human cloning. This is done through the same, but different, clones that are introduced throughout the series. These clones are fully developed individuals, but they are also patented technological inventions. Throughout the series they are often seen by ‘the villains’ as godless freak, monstrosities that must be eradicated or they are exploited for their scientific value in an experiment where the end justifies the means. This solidifies their status as Other thus indicating the issue of xenophobia, which is exactly a challenge to human unity.

Leave a Reply

4 Comments on "Orphan Black: Otherness and the Ethics of Science"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Johannes Poulsen
Editor
Johannes Poulsen

Very interesting to bring up cloning as a challenge to human unity. I haven’t watched the series yet, so I wonder: Are the clones different from humans in any other way than being cloned and thereby “artificial” in the eyes of most people? Would they be able to reproduce with ordinary humans? Do they have the same abilities and weaknesses? Does evolution play a role as a theme here? Would we categorize this challenge to unity along with robots or aliens, or do they represent a next stage in the evolutionary history of humanity?

Asker Bryld Staunæs
Member
Asker Bryld Staunæs
I really love this show, thanks for reflecting on it! To answer Johannes question, they are almost the same as humans, except for two factors: – There was a ‘production mistake’, so they all have a deadly disease and except for the lead character Sarah none of them can have babies. – They have been under surveillance and the firm, LEDA, has been controlling their entire life (until they become ‘self-aware’ in the beginning of the series). Many of them have a ‘fake husband’ or a ‘fake job’. But don’t we all have production mistakes? Ain’t we all under surveillance… Read more »
Simone Boye Mouritsen
Member
Thank you Daniel for introducing us to this series. I have yet to watch it but I will definitely look into it. Correct me if I’m wrong, but as far as I understand from your summary the clones are presented as valuable beings that should have equal rights as the true, organic humans. In other words, they a part of humanity but are never accepted as such. This is in contrast to the negative light cloning often is viewed in. How does the issues posed in Orphan Black correspond with the scientific development of cloning in our reality: Does it… Read more »
Jelica Veljovic
Member

Dear Daniel, thank you for the example, I haven’t heard for the series! However, from your description I could see that it discusses the need for changing the anthropocentric perception of the human environment, the need to show that a man or a woman doesn’t have to be the only possible measure of the world, and especcialy fromthe aspect of normality, goodness, truth. This posthumanistic need for the ethical changes is well shown on the series of photoes where the figure of man in the Da Vinci’s sketch “Vetruvian man” is replaced by woman, animal or cyborg.

wpDiscuz