Ranking affects students’ motivation in online peer review

Students’ engagement in online peer review processes is affected if students can see how their performance is ranked compared to other students’. This is the conclusion of a recent study by Assistant Professor Pantelis Papadopoulos.

peer review

Pantelis Papadopoulos at the Centre for Teaching Development and Digital Media does research in peer review conducted via a web-based learning environment. He recently carried out a study with a fellow researcher to investigate whether information related to student activity could affect performance, motivation, and engagement in an online peer review process.

The study showed that students’ motivation to participate in peer review was likely to increase, if the students could see how their level of activity ranked compared to other students. However, for some students, ranking information had the opposite effect and was used as an excuse to disengage. These students believed that a high ranking meant that they did not have to put in any additional effort. Thus, ranking information could be a double-edged sword.

No effect from usage data

Pantelis Papadopoulos and his colleague also looked into whether students’ access to usage data would affect their engagement in the process. It did not. Usage data refers to students’ actions in the learning online environment: clicks, submissions, visits, etc.

The study was carried out among Software Engineering students, grouped into three study conditions: a group with access only to usage data, a group with access to both usage data and ranking information, and a control group.

A web-based learning environment developed by Dr. Papadopoulos called eCASE was used to carry out the peer review activities. eCASE monitored and recorded every student action within the system, and the study’s findings are based on data analysis from the eCASE database, written tests, and a questionnaire recording students’ opinions on the activity.

The study was the last in a series of five on online peer review by Pantelis Papadopoulos and several different co-authors. Two of them are focusing on general issues around collaborative learning and peer review, while the rest three form a series of studies on “free-selection” peer review protocol. “Free selection” implies that students are free to select which peer work they want to review.

Read more about the studies:

More on the “free-selection” review process:

More on other issues of peer review:

 

Forrige artikel Næste artikel

Tilføj en kommentar

You may also like